Patents and Copyright- Feudalism and Cyberspace

The concept brought up in the lecture this week was feudalism and it’s connection to the systems of the web in today’s society. Ted brought up an interesting idea that was completely new to me. I had never heard of feudalism before so learning about the ways in which the feudal lords had control of the land despite the vassals paying for and using it was extremely interesting. Economy revolved around land in those days, but what happens when economy revolves around attention, information and the Internet?

It’s link to the way Facebook and other social media platforms have control over content is uncanny and made me rethink what content I was sharing on these platforms. Social media has so much control over our lives and like the vassals, we are only renting these spaces.

The differences between patents and copyright outlined in this week’s reading allow people to distinguish between the two forms of intellectual property and recognise how they influence feudalism. Patents apply to specific implementations of ideas. The idea is that no one can legally use the same idea, even if independently rediscovered, without the permission from the patent holder (Boldrin & Levine, 2007). Copyright has a narrower focus and is longer in duration. Both affect content online and have an enormous influence on the ways in which we interact and share content with others. Despite these, however, Facebook and other social media platforms have ownership of your content as soon as you post online. It’s a scary though but definitely needs to be considered.

tVOUaIz - Imgur

References:

Boldrin, M & Levine, D (2007), ‘Against Intellectual Monopoly’, Economic and Game Theory, Chapter 1, accessed 06/09/2015, <https://moodle.uowplatform.edu.au/pluginfile.php/439956/mod_resource/content/1/Boldrin%2C%20M.%20-%20Introduction%20to%20Against%20Intellectual%20Monopoly.pdf&gt;.

5 thoughts on “Patents and Copyright- Feudalism and Cyberspace”

  1. Very interesting blog post and questions you raise are very thought provoking. It’s interesting that you comment about the way social media controls our lives and the way it clogs our everyday existence, almost like us slaving away on it for entertainment in return. If that makes sense? We are the vessels of which create the content and also view the content, but without these social media platforms being available, we haven’t got much other spaces to do this. Interesting view on iFeudalism.

  2. I think one of the scariest things is that facebook can reappropriate your photos and sell them to companies. THere’s stories of women out there who found their photos on specialised dating websites.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3107372/Woman-shocked-Facebook-pictures-stolen-used-somebody-s-profile-Plenty-Fish-dating-website.html

    Another example of facebook using the photos of a DEAD girl for a dating website.
    http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/18/facebook-removes-dating-ads-featuring-photo-of-dead-girl/

  3. Patents and copyright are just a way the american stay ahead of the global competition.. you see i have a friend his father has an IT company he developed a program, he invented that software, start implementing it in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos more as a test before bring it to western market (being way more regulated and competitive).
    After showing some success, he drew attention from US company one of the many tech company collecting patterns and copyrights. They manage studying in deep his program to found one small part of a small part of a small code that was similar to theirs (on which of course they had a pattern) they sue my friend’s dad until he lost his company, his house and all his saving..(yeah! lawsuits aren’t free) The saddest is the judge gave right to my friend’s dad but in the end he already lost everything and couldn’t carry on anyway.

Leave a comment